Skip to main content

Dealing With Unstable Students



If you teach for any amount of time, you’re going to encounter mentally unstable students. The degree of instability you encounter may vary, but at some point you will encounter a student who makes you concerned for his or her own safety, or perhaps even for the safety of your other students, your colleagues, and even yourself. How do we respond to such situations appropriately, with empathy, and while protecting the safety and classroom experiences of our other students?
I was, unfortunately, recently reminded of what it is like to have to deal with a student who poses a legitimate risk to the people around them. The experience reminded me of how important it is to know the appropriate procedures for such situations, as well as how important it is for instructors to have institutional support when dealing with alarming students.
Unfortunately, the protocols, and especially the less transparent ones followed by your institution’s legal services office, are sometimes designed more to protect institutions from liability in the event of a tragedy than they are to prevent a tragedy in the first place.
Broadly, there are three categories of services that one can access at most institutions  if you are worried about a student’s behavior and/or mental health. After you have alerted your own departmental leadership, the options for reporting disturbing student behavior include your university’s offices for counseling services, legal services, and campus security. And, generally, most institution protocols for dealing with disturbed students will have you access those resources in the order outlined here. Of course, it is absolutely essential that you know and follow your institution’s specific protocols. Failing to do so could result in a significant delay in getting qualified experts to intervene with the student in question. In addition to the risks incurred by such a delay, failing to follow your institution’s protocols could in some rare cases even expose you to personal liability.
Department reporting: If a student alarms you or has already caused you to initiate your institution’s first reporting step, it’s a good idea to notify your supervisor. In many cases your supervisor will have better knowledge of appropriate college protocols, or perhaps better knowledge of the effectiveness of various offices that you may not have much experience approaching. At the very least you want the appropriate official in your department to be apprised of the situation. They can offer specific advice, or simply help you navigate institution procedures properly.
Counseling services: Institution counseling services are typically the first step in trying to connect a student with mental health services and in putting a stop to the behaviors that are worrying you. Most institutions  have counseling centers, and most of these centers have procedures for instructors to access when they are concerned about an individual student. Counseling centers are usually quite clear in providing guidelines for how to connect a worrisome or endangered student with their services. In most cases, counseling centers will “take over” dealing with the student once certain criteria have been met.
Legal services: If you and your supervisor are uncertain how to intervene with a student, or if counseling services have failed to remedy a student’s alarming behavior, I recommend consulting your institution’s legal services office. This is only really useful in non-urgent situations.
Campus police: At most institutions, if you feel that a student poses an imminent threat to himself or to others, campus police are the go-to resource. Police can react the most quickly to intervene, protect all parties’ physical safety, and ensure that the troubled student sees an appropriate mental health professional.
In some situations a institution’s options for responding to disturbing student speech or behavior may be frustratingly limited. In the event that an institution’s standard response procedures are unable to resolve the situation you’re faced with, here are some additional options and things to keep in mind. Just because the other institution officials have been unable to resolve a situation does not mean that you have to accept ongoing behaviors that make you feel threatened or that make you fear for the safety of others.
Trust your instincts and share your thoughts: Our intuition is powerful, and if a student’s speech or behavior becomes discomfiting, you need to listen to your instincts. Discuss the situation with a trusted colleague or mentor. Remember that while we have a legal obligation to protect student privacy, we are permitted to relay to appropriate institution officials those student behaviors that we observe. Students do of course have a right to privacy, but that right to privacy does not trump your right to safety. Nor should one student’s personal issues be permitted to disrupt the learning of their peers.
Create a paper trail: It can be very uncomfortable to have to create a written record of the events and behaviors that are alarming you, but it is absolutely necessary. Creating a written record of what has happened, whom you have alerted, and when, is essential. Delete nothing. Keep any relevant communications the student may have sent you, as well as any messages you sent to supervisors or other officials. If you’re really worried, it’s worth your time to record a log of events, of what behaviors you’ve observed and when, and what actions you took, from speaking to the student to contacting university officials. Such a record is particularly important if one of the university offices you’ve contacted fails to follow through on its own obligations, or if the student contests actions that you or the university initiates.
Do not diagnose: Chances are that you lack both the qualifications and the information to diagnose your troubled student’s problem. So, refrain from the attempt. Limit your account in your communications with colleagues and institution officials to verifiable facts, things that you have observed directly , and things that have been relayed to you by fellow students (only when applicable — don’t ask students to report on one another).  You impugn your own credibility when you make diagnoses that you are unqualified to make.
Do not confront: When it comes to dealing with the student of concern, don’t escalate the situation with a direct confrontation, particularly if institutional remedies such a counseling have already failed to change the student’s behavior.
Escalate, strategically, at the institutional level: Unfortunately, as a faculty member you are not always your institution’s primary concern. These are clearly options of last resort. But, if you genuinely fear for your safety and the safety of your campus community, you may be left with no other choices. Make your fears known. If you really do fear for someone’s safety, let police know. We live in a litigious society, and in cases where you feel your safety is at risk, you should use that fact to your advantage. Once a specific fear has been raised, the university is compelled to take action.
Don’t let your empathy put you at risk: Students who engage in potentially threatening speech or behaviors are often suffering from severe problems. It’s natural for us to feel badly for them, to empathize and seek to understand that they too are victims of a certain type. However, even though such students may themselves be the suffering victims of a trauma or a mental disorder that they do not deserve and did not bring upon themselves, that’s no reason to accept risk to your own person or to the other students and colleagues. If you’re uncertain how to proceed with a disturbing student, seek advice from colleagues and supervisors.
Those who, luckily, have never had to interact with a truly unstable student may interpret this column as paranoid. Instructors who interact with students week in and week out may be well positioned to help unstable students receive the services that they need. In extreme cases, intervening at the right moment may prevent tragedy.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Reaction to Globalization

Globalization and the attendant concerns about poverty and inequality have become a focus of discussion in a way that few other topics, except for international terrorism or global warming, have. Most people have a strong opinion on globalization, and all of them express an interest in the well-being of the world's poor. The financial press and influential international officials confidently assert that global free markets expand the horizons for the poor, whereas activist-protesters hold the opposite belief with equal intensity. Yet the strength of people's conviction is often in inverse proportion to the amount of robust factual evidence they have.As is common in contentious public debates, different people mean different things by the same word. Some interpret "globalization" to mean the global reach of communications technology and capital movements, some think of the outsourcing by domestic companies in rich countries, and others see globalization as a byword for

LEARNING DISABILITIES

The term learning disability refers to many different types of learning issues that can vary widely in levels of severity. Students with a learning disability have at least average intelligence. They have areas of high functioning and areas of difficulties. Their learning disabilities are not caused by problem, such as vision or hearing impairments, or by primary emotional disturbance, and their challenges are not the result of poor schooling. Students with learning disabilities take in information, such as sights or sounds, but may have difficulty understanding or attaching meaning to it. They find it hard to organize information so that it is readily accessible. Retrieving the information from either short or long term memory is difficult. In addition, expressing the information, either verbally through speech or writing, or nonverbally may be a problem. Students with learning disabilities often exhibit wide discrepancies between different skills areas, in other words, they may be g

A TEACHER’S TRIBUTE TO STUDENTS

Teaching is a passion, and my experience as a teacher has been beautiful, emotional and fulfilling. Over the years, I’ve watched the student – teacher equation evolve: From Guru, as all-knowing to Guru as friend and equal, as someone who doesn’t always know the best. Today’s teacher and the learner are partners in the process of teaching and learning. We inspire, motivate and learn from each other; if I don’t know, I can admit it to my students. The teacher is only a facilitator; one who will help the student grow, become a self-learner. The teacher is only one of many sources. Not infrequently, there is a role reversal. With children being so tech-savy, often I am the student and they are my teachers. Has teaching changes the way I think ? Yes, most certainly. My students have shown me how to manage time. I marvel at how deftly they juggle sports, academics, dance, and theatre, for instance. I have learnt how to accept failure as I see my students taking success and failure with equan