Protest has been part of
human societies for millennia. Movements such as Black Lives Matter and Me Too
offer a powerful reminder of the continued relevance of activism in the 21st
century.
While these examples of
protest share a common DNA with historical civil rights and gender equality
movements, activists today operate in a world where digital technology affords
particular advantages and disadvantages that have changed how we engage with
protest and dissent. We now have constant access to a steady stream of
information about dissatisfaction with the state of our world, who is alleged
to be responsible for the situation, and who is calling for change.
Consequently, it has never
been easier for activists to disseminate messages, educate the public and encourage
participation by like-minded people.
Digital technology has also been criticized for facilitating ‘armchair activism’, in which dissent can be expressed in a single click or tweet instead of substantive action to achieve genuine change and.
Digital technology has also been criticized for facilitating ‘armchair activism’, in which dissent can be expressed in a single click or tweet instead of substantive action to achieve genuine change and.
How does digital
technology change the way activists operate compared to historical models of
protest and activism? What can today’s activists learn from historical
instances of protest? What impact does online activism have upon the importance
of space and place to protests? How do new and emerging technologies change the
way we understand and value online engagement as a form of protest and
activism? How can these understandings assist activists in developing more
effective strategies for achieving their goals in the future?
Comments